Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated Methods for Monitoring the Invasive Potential and Management of Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant hogweed) in Switzerland

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological invasions are a major driver of human-induced global environmental change. This makes monitoring of potential spread, population changes and control measures necessary for guiding management. We illustrate the value of integrated methods (species distribution modelling (SDM), plant population monitoring and questionnaires) for monitoring and assessing invasions of Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant hogweed) over time in Switzerland. SDMs highlighted the potential spread of the species, uncovered ecological mechanisms underlying invasions and guided monitoring at a regional level. We used adaptive and repeat plant sampling to monitor invasive population status and changes, and assess the effectiveness of H. mantegazzianum management over three periods (2005, 2013 and 2018) within the pre-Alps, Vaud. We also conducted questionnaire surveys with managers and the public. Multiscale modelling, and integrating global and regional SDMs, provided the best predictions, showing that H. mantegazzianum can potentially invade large parts of Switzerland, especially below 2 000 m a.s.l. Over time, populations of invasive H. mantegazzianum in the Vaud pre-Alps have declined, which is most likely due to a sharp rise in management uptake post 2007 (7% of municipalities before 2007 to 86% in 2018). The level of known invasive populations has decreased by 54% over time. Some municipalities have even successfully eradicated H. mantegazzianum within their borders. However, a few areas, particularly in the rural, higher-altitude municipalities, where management was not implemented effectively, populations have expanded, which could hamper control efforts at lower altitudes. We provide encouraging evidence that control measures can be effective in reducing plant invasions with long-term commitment, as well as a good template for using integrated methodological approaches to better study and monitor invasive alien species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adriaens T, Sutton-Croft M, Owen K, Brosens D, van Valkenburg J, Kilbey D, Groom Q, Ehmig C, Thürkow F, Van Hende P, Schneider K (2015) Trying to engage the crowd in recording invasive alien species in Europe: experiences from two smartphone applications in northwest Europe. Manag Biol Invasion 6:215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach TM, Kull CA, Rangan H (2019) From killing lists to healthy country: Aboriginal approaches to weed control in the Kimberley, Western Australia. J Environ Manag 229:182–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Villalobos F (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol Model 222:1810–1819

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JR, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossey B (1999) Before, during and after: the need for long-term monitoring in invasive plant species management. Biol Invasions 1:301–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Broennimann O, Guisan A (2008) Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter. Biol Lett 4:585–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JA (1994) The application of adaptive cluster sampling to ecological studies. In Statistics in Ecology and Environmental Monitoring. p. 86–97

  • Bryce R, Oliver MK, Davies L, Gray H, Urquhart J, Lambin X (2011) Turning back the tide of American mink invasion at an unprecedented scale through community participation and adaptive management. Biol Conserv 144:575–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Chefaoui RM, Lobo JM (2008) Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance. Ecol Model 210:478–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy MJ, Runge JP, Barker RJ, Schofield MR, Fonnesbeck CJ (2008) Efficient estimation of abundance for patchily distributed populations via two-phase, adaptive sampling. Ecol 89:3362–3370

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessimoz F (2006) Invasive potential of the Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum) in the Western Swiss Alps and implications for management. Dissertation, University of Lausanne

  • Downey PO (2010) Managing widespread, alien plant species to ensure biodiversity conservation: a case study using an 11-step planning process. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3:451–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey PO, Williams MC, Whiffen LK, Auld BA, Hamilton MA, Burley AL, Turner PJ (2010) Managing alien plants for biodiversity outcomes—the need for triage. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 40:677–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Office for the Environments (FOEN) (2006) Invasive alien species in Switzerland: an inventory of alien species and their threat to biodiversity and economy in Switzerland. FOEN, Bern

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman EA, Moisen GG (2008) A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and kappa. Ecol Model 217:48–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth GG, Le Maitre DC, O’farrell PJ, van Wilgen BW (2012) The prioritisation of invasive alien plant control projects using a multi-criteria decision model informed by stakeholder input and spatial data. J Environ Manag 103:51–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallien L, Douzet R, Pratte S, Zimmermann NE, Thuiller W (2012) Invasive species distribution models–how violating the equilibrium assumption can create new insights. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1126–1136

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Edwards TC, Hastie T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Model 157:89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A et al. (2013) Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecol Lett 16:1424–1435

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W, Zimmermann NE (2017) Habitat suitability and distribution models, with applications in R. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2009) Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J Ecol 97:393–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson L (2007) Invasive, naturalized and casual alien plants in southern Africa: a summary based on the Southern African Plant Invaders Atlas (SAPIA). Bothalia 37:a322

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry P, Le Lay G, Goudet J, Guisan A, Jahodová Š, Besnard G (2009) Reduced genetic diversity, increased isolation and multiple introductions of invasive gian hogweed in the western Swiss Alps. Mol Ecol 18:2819–2831

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A (2006) Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol Model 199:142–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard PL (2019) Human adaptation to invasive species: a conceptual framework based on a case study metasynthesis. Ambio 48:1401–1430

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahodová Š, Trybush S, Pyšek P, Wade M, Karp A (2007) Invasive species of Heracleum in Europe: an insight into genetic relationships and invasion history. Divers Distrib 13:99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandová K, Klinerová T, Müllerová J, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Cajthaml T, Dostál P (2014) Long-term impact of Heracleum mantegazzianum invasion on soil chemical and biological characteristics. Soil Biol Biochem 68:270–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanmonod D (1999) La berce du Caucase: une genevoise belle et dangereuse. Saussurea 30:62–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeschke JM et al. (2014) Defining the impact of non‐native species. Conserv Biol 28:1188–1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Valverde A, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Overton JM, Aragón P, Lobo JM (2011) Use of niche models in invasive species risk assessments. Biol Invasions 13:2785–2797

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan H, Van Zyl HWF, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Wilson JRU (2012) Distribution and management of Acacia implexa (Benth.) in South Africa: a suitable target for eradication? South Afr J Bot 83:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RE, Townsend PA, Gross JE, Cohen WB, Bolstad P, Wang YQ, Adams P (2009) Remote sensing change detection tools for natural resource managers: Understanding concepts and tradeoffs in the design of landscape monitoring projects. Remote Sens Environ 113:1382–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • King SA, Downey PO (2008) Assessing the recovery of native plant species following bitou bush control-the need for monitoring. Plant Prot Q 23:40

    Google Scholar 

  • Krinke L, Moravcová L, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Perglová I (2005) Seed bank of an invasive alien, Heracleum mantegazzianum, and its seasonal dynamics. Seed Sci Res 15:239–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull CA, Shackleton CM, Cunningham PJ, Ducatillon C, Dufour‐Dror JM, Esler KJ, Friday JB, Gouveia AC, Griffin AR, Marchante E, Midgley SJ (2011) Adoption, use and perception of Australian acacias around the world. Divers Distrib 17:822–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Latombe G et al. (2017) A vision for global monitoring of biological invasions. Biol Conserv 213:295–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagey K, Duinslaeger L, Vanderkelen A (1995) Burns induced by plants. Burns 21:542–543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee II H, Reusser DA, Olden JD, Smith SS, Graham J, Burkett V, Dukes JS, Piorkowski RJ, McPhedran J (2008) Integrated monitoring and information systems for managing aquatic invasive species in a changing climate. Conserv Biol 22:575–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons JE, Runge MC, Laskowski HP, Kendall WL (2008) Monitoring in the context of structured decision-making and adaptive management. J Wild Manag 72:1683–1692

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmion M, Parviainen M, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Thuiller W (2009) Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Diversity Distrib 15(5):9–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, Ackroyd JM, Walshe KAR (2002) Two-phase stratified random surveys on multiple populations at multiple locations. N Z J Mar Freshw 36:581–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell BD, Lehnhoff E, Rew LJ (2009) The rationale for monitoring invasive plant populations as a crucial step for management. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 2:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Mod HK, Scherrer D, Luoto M, Guisan A (2016) What we use is not what we know: environmental predictors in plant distribution models. J Veg Sci 27:1308–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty NP, Measey J (2018) Reconstructing biological invasions using public surveys: a new approach to retrospectively assess spatio-temporal changes in invasive spread. Biol Invasions 21:467–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcová L, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Perglová I, Jarošík V (2006) Seasonal pattern of germination and seed longevity in the invasive species Heracleum mantegazzianum. Preslia 78:287–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcová L, Pyšek P, Krinke L, Müllerová J, Perglová I, Pergl J (2018) Long-term survival in soil of buried seed of an invasive herb Heracleum mantegazzianum. Preslia 90:225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Müllerová J, Pergl J, Pyšek P (2013) Remote sensing as a tool for monitoring plant invasions: testing the effects of data resolution and image classification approach on the detection of a model plant species Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant hogweed). Int J Appl Earth Obs 25:55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen C, Ravn HP, Nentwig W, Wade M (2005) The Giant Hogweed Best Practice Manual. Guidelines for the management and control of an invasive weed in Europe. Forest and Landscape Denmark, Hoersholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Novoa A et al. (2018) A framework for engaging stakeholders on the management of alien species. J Environ Manag 205:286–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GV, Underwood EC, D’amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth: a new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioSci 51:933–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Page NA, Wall RE, Darbyshire SJ, Mulligan GA (2006) The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 4. Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier. Can J Plant Sci 86:569–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagès M, Fischer A, Van der Wal R (2018) The dynamics of volunteer motivations for engaging in the management of invasive plants: insights from a mixed-methods study on Scottish seabird islands. J Environ Plann Manag 61:904–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetta FD (2007) Evaluation of weed eradication programs: containment and extirpation. Divers Distrib 13:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Pergl J, Perglová I, Pyšek P, Dietz H (2006) Population age structure and reproductive behaviour of the monocarpic perennial Heracleum mantegazzianum (Apiaceae) in its native and invaded distribution ranges. Am J Bot 93:1018–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Pergl J, Müllerová J, Perglová I, Herben T, Pyšek P (2011) The role of long‐distance seed dispersal in the local population dynamics of an invasive plant species. Divers Distrib 17:725–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Pergl J, Pyšek P, Perglová I, Jarošík V (2012) Low persistence of a monocarpic invasive plant in historical sites biases our perception of its actual distribution. J Biogeog 39:1293–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Pergl J, Sádlo J, Petrusek A, Laštůvka Z, Musil J, Perglová I, Šanda R, Šefrová H, Šíma J, Vohralík V, Pyšek P (2016) Black, Grey and Watch Lists of alien species in the Czech Republic based on environmental impacts and management strategy. NeoBiota 28:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Perglová I, Pergl J, Pyšek P (2006) Flowering phenology and reproductive effort of the invasive alien plant Heracleum mantegazzianum. Preslia 78:265–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geography of species’ invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q Rev Biol 78:19–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitpierre B, McDougall K, Seipel T, Broennimann O, Guisan A, Kueffer C (2016) Will climate change increase the risk of plant invasions into mountains? Ecol Appl 26:530–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitpierre B, Broennimann O, Kueffer C, Daehler C, Guisan A (2017) Selecting predictors to maximize the transferability of species distribution models: lessons from cross-continental plants invasions. Glob Ecol Biogeog 26:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyrard N, Sabbadin R, Spring D, Brook B, Mac Nally R (2013) Model-based adaptive spatial sampling for occurrence map construction. Stat Comput 23:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31(2):161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Mandák B, Francítrková T, Prach K (2001) Persistence of stout clonal herbs as invaders in the landscape: a field test of historical records. In: Brundu G, Brock J, Camarda I, Child L, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: species ecology and ecosystem management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, p 235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Cock MJW, Nentwig W, Ravn HP (2007) Ecology and management of giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). CAB International, Wallingford

  • Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Müllerová J, Pergl J, Wild J (2008) Comparing the rate of invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum at continental, regional, and local scales. Divers Distrib 14:355–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737

    Google Scholar 

  • Randin CF, Dirnböck T, Dullinger S, Zimmermann N, Zappa M, Guisanm A (2006) Are niche-based species distributions models transferable in space? J Biogeogr 33:1689–1703

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Huntley BJ, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM (2017) A rapid survey of the invasive plant species in western Angola. Afr J Ecol 55:56–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Seebens H et al. (2017) No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat Commun 8:14435

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton RT, Le Maitre DC, Richardson DM (2015) Stakeholder perceptions and practices regarding Prosopis (mesquite) invasions and management in South Africa. Ambio 44:569–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton RT, Le Maitre DC, van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM (2016) Identifying barriers to effective management of widespread invasive alien trees: Prosopis species (mesquite) in South Africa as a case study. Glob Environ Change 38:183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton RT, Le Maitre DC, van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM (2017) Towards a national strategy to optimise the management of a widespread invasive tree (Prosopis species; mesquite) in South Africa. Ecosyst Serv 27:242–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton RT, Biggs R, Richardson DM, Larson BM (2018) Social-ecological drivers and impacts of invasion-related regime shifts: consequences for ecosy services and human wellbeing. Environ Sci Policy 89:300–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton RT et al. (2019) Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species: a review. J Environ Manag 229:88–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiferaw H, Bewket W, Alamirew T, Zeleke G, Teketay D, Bekele K, Schaffner U, Eckert S (2019) Implications of land use/land cover dynamics and Prosopis invasion on ecosystem service values in Afar Region, Ethiopia. Sci Total Environ 675:354–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele J, Otte A (2007) Impact of Heracleum mantegazzianum on invaded vegetation and human activities. In: Pyšek P, Cock MJW, Nentwig W, Ravn HP (eds) Ecology and management of giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). CAB International, Wallingford, p 144–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SK, Seber GAF (1996) Adaptive sampling. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SK (2012) Sampling, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

  • Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in Europe? J Biogeogr 31:353–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, Rouget M (2005) Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob Change Biol 11:2234–2250

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Araújo MB (2009) BIOMOD—a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography (Cop) 32:369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Trottier N, Groeneveld E, Lavoie C (2017) Giant hogweed at its northern distribution limit in North America: Experiments for a better understanding of its dispersal dynamics along rivers. River Res Appl 33:1098–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiley GED, Dodd FS, Wade PM (1996) Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier. J Ecol 84:297–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner II BL et al. (2016) Socio-Environmental Systems (SES) Research: what have we learned and how can we use this information in future research programs. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 19:160–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg EC, Kotze I, Beukes H (2013) Detection, quantification and monitoring of Prosopis in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa using remote sensing and GIS. S Afr J Geomat 2:68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wilgen BW, Forsyth GG, Le Maitre DC, Wannenburgh A, Kotzé JD, Van den Berg E, Henderson L (2012) An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa. Biol Conserv 148:28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wilgen BW, Fill JM, Baard J, Cheney C, Forsyth AT, Kraaij T (2016) Historical costs and projected future scenarios for the management of invasive alien plants in protected areas in the Cape Floristic Region. Biol Conserv 200:168–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaz AS et al. (2017) The progress of interdisciplinarity in invasion science. Ambio 46:428–442

  • Verbruggen H, Tyberghein L, Belton GS, Mineur F, Jueterbock A, Hoarau G, Gurgel CFD, De Clerck O (2013) Improving transferability of introduced species’ distribution models: new tools to forecast the spread of a highly invasive seaweed. PLoS ONE 8:e68337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente J, Randin CF, Gonçalves J, Metzger MJ, Lomba Â, Honrado J, Guisan A (2011) Where will conflicts between alien and rare species occur after climate and land-use change? A test with a novel combined modelling approach. Biol Invasions 13:1209–1227

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente JR, Alagador D, Guerra C, Alonso JM, Kueffer C, Vaz AS, Fernandes RF, Cabral JA, Araujo MB, Honrado JP (2016) Cost‐effective monitoring of biological invasions under global change: a model‐based framework. J Appl Ecol 53:1317–1329

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser V, Langdon B, Pauchard A, Richardson DM (2014) Unlocking the potential of Google Earth as a tool in invasion science. Biol Invasions 16:513–534

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2007) Long-Distance Dispersal of Plants by Vehicles as a Driver of Plant Invasions. Conserv Biol 21(4):986–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Gairifo C, Gibson MR, Arianoutsou M, Bakar BB, Baret S, Celesti‐Grapow L, DiTomaso JM, Dufour‐Dror JM, Kueffer C, Kull CA (2011) Risk assessment, eradication, and biological control: global efforts to limit Australian acacia invasions. Divers Distrib 17:1030–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt A, Shackleton RT, Beale T, Nunda W, van Wilgen BW (2019) Distribution of invasive alien Tithonia (Asteraceae) species in eastern and southern Africa and the socio-ecological impacts of T. diversifolia in Zambia. Bothalia 49:a2356

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward FI (1987) Climate and plant distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2001) Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 16:446–453

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the municipalities of the Prealps for providing information on eradication measures, and issuing permits to work in the area, as well as the Golf Club of Villars for allowing us to conduct field sampling at the golf course. Luc Jaccottet, Jessica Finders, Frank Rein and Marie Gallot Lavallée helped with field work in 2013, and Louisa Wood in 2018. We also thank the commune officials and the public for responding to our questionnaires. This project obtained support from the IntegrAlp project of the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant nr CR23I2_162754). We thank the GIANT ALIEN project for providing the list of localities in Russia. JP and PP were supported by EXPRO grant no. 19-28807× (Czech Science Foundation) and long-term research development project RVO 67985939 (The Czech Academy of Sciences).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross T. Shackleton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shackleton, R.T., Petitpierre, B., Pajkovic, M. et al. Integrated Methods for Monitoring the Invasive Potential and Management of Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant hogweed) in Switzerland. Environmental Management 65, 829–842 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01282-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01282-9

Keywords

Navigation