{"id":82,"date":"2015-01-09T14:11:13","date_gmt":"2015-01-09T13:11:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/?page_id=82"},"modified":"2026-03-20T22:28:03","modified_gmt":"2026-03-20T21:28:03","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/publications\/","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<h6>2026<\/h6>\n<ul>\n<li>Morrison G.S., Biedermann A., Tart M., Meuwly D., Berger C.E.H., Guiness J. 2026, Addendum to: A response to EA-4\/23 INF:2025 &#8220;The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO\/IEC 17025:2017&#8221;, Forensic Science International, 381, 112857, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2026.112857. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2026\/03\/addendumpreprintvf.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h6>2025<\/h6>\n<ul>\n<li>Biedermann A. 2025, Distinguishing exogenously and endogenously defined reliability from individual report accuracy in expert and machine evidence, Law, Probability and Risk, 24, 1\u201320, doi.org\/10.1093\/lpr\/mgaf012. [<a href=\"https:\/\/api.unil.ch\/iris\/server\/api\/core\/bitstreams\/be7cb201-4f8d-46c0-aebb-b6c99ff223fe\/content\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Morrison G.S., Biedermann A., Tart M., Meuwly D., Berger C.E.H., Guiness J., Houck M.M., Gibb C., Dawid A.P., Kotsoglou K.N., Kaye D.H., Rose P., Taroni F., Kokshoorn B., Saks M.J., Buckleton J.S., Curran J.M., Taylor D., Zhang C., Vuille J., Champod C., Simonsen B.T., Mattei A., Lucena-Molina J.J., Zabell S., Chin J.M., Gallidabino M., Wevers G., Moreton R., Eldridge H., Martire K.A., Aitken C.G.G., Cole S.A., Gonz\u00e1lez-Rodr\u00edguez J., Smithuis M., Edvardsen T., Wilson-Wilde L., Zadora G., Gittelson S., Jackson G., Sjerps M., Brard F., Hicks T., Kennedy J., Latten B.G.H., Weber P., Willis S., Ramos D., Koehler J.J., Ribeiro R.O., Crispino F., Basu N., Meakin G.E., Kirkbride K.P., Tully G., Jessen M., Syndercombe Court D. 2025, A response to EA-4\/23 INF:2025 &#8220;The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO\/IEC 17025:2017&#8221;, Forensic Science International, 376, 112589. [<a href=\"https:\/\/iris.unil.ch\/handle\/iris\/274932\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A. 2025, Literaturanzeige: Ralf Neuhaus, Heiko Artk\u00e4mper, Grit Weise, Kriminaltechnik und Beweisf\u00fchrung im Strafverfahren, Schweizerische Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Strafrecht, 143, 237\u2013247. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2025\/06\/literaturanzeige_ab_preprint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Hicks T., Biedermann A., Champod C., Taroni F. 2025, Interpretation and education: (sub) source and activity issues, similar challenges? in: Proceedings of the 30th Congress of the International Society for Forensic Genetics, Butler J. M. et al. (Eds.), Santiago de Compostela: Edici\u00f3ns Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 681\u2013688, doi.org\/10.15304\/cc.2025.1869. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2025\/05\/hicks_etal_2025.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Champod C. 2025, Why the post-identification era is long overdue: Commentary on the current controversy over forensic feature comparison as applied to forensic firearms examination, International Journal of Evidence &amp; Proof, 29, 140\u2013160, doi.org\/10.1177\/12657127241278069. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2025\/04\/biedermann_champod_2025.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Kotsoglou K.N. 2025, More digital evidence exceptionalism: Critique of the argument-based method for evaluative opinions, Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 53, 301885, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsidi.2025.301885. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2025\/02\/Biedermann_Kotsoglou_2025.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Kotsoglou K.N. 2025, Scientific imperialism: \u201cThe judge made me do it!\u201d, Science &amp; Justice, 65, 119\u2013125, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2025.01.003. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2025\/01\/DNA_Comment_20250125_POSTPRINT.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h6>2024<\/h6>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<ul>\n<li>Biedermann A., Lau T. 2024, Decisionalizing the problem of reliance on expert and machine evidence, Law, Probability and Risk, 23, 1\u201328, mgae007, doi.org\/10.1093\/mgae007. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_87B6E150DC4A.P002\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Kotsoglou K.N., Biedermann A. 2024, The unassailable nature of ground truth in scientific research: Response to Asonov et al., Forensic Science International: Synergy, 9, 100556, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsisyn.2024,100556. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_5C959CC387EC.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A. 2024, Subtleties in Bayesian decision-theoretic analysis for forensic findings: Notes on recent discussion of the role of validation study data in rational decision making, Forensic Science International: Synergy, 9, 100548, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsisyn.2024.100548. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_9BD7A1D33080.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Vuille J., Biedermann A. 2024, Le ph\u00e9notypage forensique dans la proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale Suisse, Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Schweizerisches Recht, 143, 211\u2013231. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_D155237E9220.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Kotsoglou K. N., Biedermann A. 2024, Polygraph-based deception detection and machine learning. Combining the worst of both worlds? Forensic Science International: Synergy, 9, 100479, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsisyn.2024.100479. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_D91E32A7A75E.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Kotsoglou K. N. 2024, Zur (Un-)Wissenschaftlichkeit der Individualisierungspraxis in forensisch-wissenschaftlichen Gutachten, sui generis, 11\u201320, doi.org\/10.21257\/sg.247. [<a href=\"https:\/\/sui-generis.ch\/article\/view\/sg.247\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">online<\/a>][<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_D4C8A39B7E7F.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Kotsoglou K. N. 2024, The unbearable lightness of ignoring axiomatic principles \u2013 A response to: \u201cOn coping in a non-binary world: Rejoinder to Biedermann and Kotsoglou\u201d (by Nicholas Scurich and Richard S. John, in: Statistics and Public Policy, 2024). [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_456ADCAA77BE.P002\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>][<a href=\"https:\/\/pubpeer.com\/publications\/20CAC12B4F12FA2DA247E6A9067D55#1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PubPeer<\/a>][<a href=\"https:\/\/tinyurl.com\/ResponseToSJ20240214\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RG<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Kotsoglou K. N. 2024, Commentary on \u201cThree-Way ROCs for Forensic Decision Making\u201d by Nicholas Scurich and Richard S. John (in: Statistics and Public Policy), Statistics and Public Policy, 11, 1\u20132. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_80AA8FA2FA20.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h6>2023<\/h6>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<ul>\n<li>Biedermann A., Vuille J. 2023, Was ist der Beweiswert von DNA-Analyseergebnissen? 2. Teil: Probleme bei der Anwendung der grundlegenden Prinzipien der Befundbewertung, Schweizerische Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Strafrecht, 141, 261\u2013281. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_AF56CDFED2A4.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Vuille J., Biedermann A. 2023, Was ist der Beweiswert von DNA-Analyseergebnissen? 1. Teil: Allgemeine Betrachtungen zum befundbewertenden Bericht, Schweizerische Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Strafrecht, 141, 137\u2013156. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_5CC8BA0D7530.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Taroni F. 2023, Bayesian networks and influence diagrams, in: Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, Third Edition, Houck M. (Eds.), Oxford: Elsevier, 271\u2013280. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2022\/11\/Preprint_ABFT_BNsIDs.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Champod C., Biedermann A. 2023, Overview and meaning of identification\/individualization, in: Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, Third Edition, Houck M. (Eds.), Oxford: Elsevier, 53\u201362. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2022\/11\/Preprint_CCAB_ID.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Taroni F., Biedermann A., Aitken C. 2023, Statistical interpretation of evidence: Bayesian analysis, in: Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, Third Edition, Houck M. (Eds.), Oxford: Elsevier, 656\u2013663. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2022\/11\/Preprint_FTABCC_Stats.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h6>2022<\/h6>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<ul>\n<li>Biedermann A., Taroni F. 2022, \u00c9valuation probabiliste et d\u00e9cision d\u2019identification, in: Traces d\u2019armes \u00e0 feu, Expertise des armes et des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de munitions dans l\u2019investigation criminelle, 3rd Ed., Gallusser A. et al. (Eds.), Lausanne: EPFL Press, 91\u2013120. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2023\/03\/BiedermannTaroni_Chap4.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Werner D., Gobat G., Rhumorbarbe D., Biedermann A., Taroni F., Gallusser A. 2022, Examen et interpr\u00e9tation des traces sur les \u00e9l\u00e9ments de munitions, in: Traces d\u2019armes \u00e0 feu, Expertise des armes et des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de munitions dans l\u2019investigation criminelle, 3rd Ed., Gallusser A. et al. (Eds.), Lausanne: EPFL Press, 373\u2013432. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2023\/03\/Werner_etal_Chap9.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Gassner A.-L., Werner D., Biedermann A., Robyr O., Taroni F., Gallusser A. 2022, Examen et interpr\u00e9tation des r\u00e9sidus de tir, in: Traces d\u2019armes a\u0300 feu, Expertise des armes et des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de munitions dans l\u2019investigation criminelle, 3rd Ed., Gallusser A. et al. (Eds.), Lausanne: EPFL Press, 433\u2013521. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2023\/03\/Gassner_etal_Chap10.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Bozza S., Taroni F., Biedermann A., 2022, Bayes factors for forensic decision analysis with R, Springer Texts in Statistics, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-09839-0. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_2AB34119FC9E.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Koehler J. J. 2022, Influence diagrams for complex litigation, Jurimetrics, 62 (Winter), 131\u2013171. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_71E4C55D3DC9.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Machine learning enthusiasts should stick to the facts. Response to Morrison et al. (2022), Forensic Science International: Synergy, 4, 100229, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsisyn.2022.100229. [<a href=\"https:\/\/reader.elsevier.com\/reader\/sd\/pii\/S2589871X22000146?token=5E3BF55F9CBFF7700C8D8AA5E0E7B9C45AF6BD9E77FCCD945288B35E0724E9EC6D8C9358575E9724F29A69C3715C2082&amp;originRegion=eu-west-1&amp;originCreation=20220512124516\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2022\/05\/1-s2.0-S2589871X22000146-main.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF2<\/a>][<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2022\/06\/Biedermann_2022b.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF3 Published Version<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Kotsoglou K. N., Biedermann A. 2022, Inroads into the ultimate issue rule? Structural elements of communication between experts and fact finders, The Journal of Criminal Law, 86, 223\u2013240, doi.org\/10.1177\/00220183211073640. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_274850217C5B.S001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A. 2022, The strange persistence of (source) &#8220;identification&#8221; claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism, Forensic Science International: Synergy, 4, 100222. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_2D9A55C584FE.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Kotsoglou K. N. 2022, (Un-)Interpretability in expert evidence: an inquiry into the frontiers of evidential assessment, Quaestio facti (Revista Internacional sobre Razonamiento Probatorio Quaestio facti. International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning), 3, 481\u2013515, doi.org\/10.33115\/udg_bib\/qf.i3.22599. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_EBF674366E5F.S001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h6>2021<\/h6>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<ul>\n<li>Taroni F., Bozza S., Biedermann A. 2021, The logic of inference and decision for scientific evidence, in: Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law, Dahlman C., Stein A., Tuzet G. (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 251\u2013266. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2021\/11\/Taroni_etal_PhilFoundations_2021.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Caruso D., Kotsoglou K. 2021, Decision theory, relative plausibility and the criminal standard of proof, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 15, 131\u2013157, doi.org\/10.1007\/s11572-020-09527-8. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2021\/06\/20200220_Postprint4.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Kotsoglou K. 2021, Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: &#8220;Inconclusive decisions&#8221; and the structure of error rate studies, Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3, 100147, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsisyn.2021.100147. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_55D5CBC5D2EC.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h6>2020<\/h6>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<ul>\n<li>Kotsoglou K., Biedermann A., Vuille J. 2020, DNA und Beweisw\u00fcrdigung \u2013 Der statistische Rubikon und die Dogmatik der Identit\u00e4tsfeststellung, Zeitschrift f\u00fcr die gesamte Straftrechtswissenschaft, 132, 891\u2013937, doi.org\/10.1515\/zstw-2020-0032. [<a href=\"https:\/\/serval.unil.ch\/resource\/serval:BIB_11577DD13F8E.P001\/REF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Taroni F., Bozza S., Biedermann A. 2020, Decision theory, in: Handbook of Forensic Statistics, Banks D. L., Kafadar K., Kaye D.H., Tackett M. (Eds.), Chapman &amp; Hall\/CRC Handbooks of Modern Statistical Methods, Chapter 5, 103\u2013130. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/11\/PostPrintFV3.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Pope S., Biedermann A. (Eds.) 2o20, The dialogue between forensic scientists, statisticians and lawyers about complex scientific issues for court [E-book], Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA, doi.org\/10.3389\/978-2-88966-049-0 (11 articles, 22 authors). [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/10\/9782889660490.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>][<a href=\"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/research-topics\/4000\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">HTML<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Kotsoglou K. 2020, Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation, Forensic Science International: Synergy, 2, 262\u2013274, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsisyn.2020.08.004. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/09\/Biedermann_Kotsoglou_2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S2589871X2030053X\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">HTML<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Pope S., Biedermann A. 2020, Editorial: The dialogue between forensic scientists, statisticians and lawyers about complex scientific issues for court, Frontiers in Genetics, 11, Article 704, 1\u20132. doi.org\/10.3389\/fgene.2020.00704. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/08\/Pope_Biedermann_2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Lau T., Biedermann A. 2020, Assessing AI output in legal decision-making with nearest neighbors, Penn State Law Review, 124, 609\u2013655. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/07\/Lau_Biedermann_2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3459870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">SSRN<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F. 2020, L&#8217;individualizzazione come decisione, Philosophical Readings, 20, 335\u2013347. doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.3854491. [<a href=\"https:\/\/zenodo.org\/record\/3854491\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">WEB<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/06\/BiedermannBozzaTaroni_PhilsophicalReadings2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>] [Translation of: Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F. 2016, The decisionalization of individualization, Forensic Science International, 266, 29-38, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2016.04.029. Translated by Marcello di Bello.]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A. 2020, Letter to the Editor: Commentary on \u201cIs it possible to predict the origin of epithelial cells? \u2013 A comparison of secondary transfer of skin epithelial cells versus vaginal mucous membrane cells by direct contact, M.M. Bouzga et al., Science &amp; Justice, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2020.02.003\u201d, Science &amp; Justice, 60, 201\u2013203, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2020.04.005. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/05\/20200505_PredictCommentPostPrintFV.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Cole S.A., Biedermann A. 2020, How can a forensic result be a \u201cdecision\u201d? A critical analysis of ongoing reforms of forensic reporting formats for federal examiners, Houston Law Review, 57, 551\u2013592. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/03\/Cole_Biedermann2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F. 2020, Normative decision analysis in forensic science, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28, 7\u201325, doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-018-9232-2. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/10\/Biedermannetal2018_ICAIL_Postprint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F., Vuille J. 2020, Computational normative decision support structures of forensic interpretation in the legal process, SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology and Society, 17, 83\u2013124. doi.org\/10.2966\/scrip.170120.83. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/01\/Biedermann_etal_2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/script-ed.org\/article\/computational-normative-decision-support-structures-of-forensic-interpretation-in-the-legal-process\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">HTML<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h6>2019<\/h6>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<ul>\n<li>Hicks T., Biedermann A., Taroni F., Champod C. 2019, Problematic reporting in DNA cases: the need for accredited formats and certified reporting competence, Forensic Science International : Genetics Supplement Series, 7, 205\u2013207. doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsigss.2019.09.079. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2020\/01\/Hicksetal_2019_Preprint5.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Vuille J., Biedermann A. 2019, Une preuve scientifique suffit-elle pour fonder une condamnation p\u00e9nale?, Revue de droit suisse, 138, 491\u2013512. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/12\/20191220_VuilleBiedermann2019Postprint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Caruso D., Biedermann A., Vuille J., Gilby D. 2019, In support of a decisional paradigm for assisted dying, Criminal Law Journal, 43, 254\u2013273. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/10\/CarusoEtal_2019_Postprint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Gittelson S. 2019, Letter to the editor: Commentary on \u201cStrategic choice in linear sequential unmasking, Roger Koppl, Science &amp; Justice, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2018.10.010\u201d, Science &amp; Justice, 59, 362\u2013365. doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2019.01.004. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/05\/BiedermannGittelson_Archive.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Jackson G., Biedermann A. 2019, &#8220;Source&#8221; or &#8220;Activity&#8221; What is the level of issue in a criminal trial?, Significance (Special Issue: Forensic Science and Statistics), April 2019, Volume 16, Issue 2, 36\u201339. doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1740-9713.2019.01253.x. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/04\/Jackson_Biedermann_2019-Significance.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Hicks T. 2019, Letter to the Editor: Commentary on \u201cDennis McNevin, Bayesian interpretation of discrete class characteristics, Forensic Science International, 292 (2018) 125\u2013130\u201d, Forensic Science International, 297, e20\u2013e21, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2019.01.005. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/01\/20190115_NComment_PostPrint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F., Vuille J. 2019, Are inconclusive decisions in forensic science as deficient as they are said to be?, Frontiers in Psychology (Cognition), 10, Article 520, 1\u20139, doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00520. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/03\/BiedermannBozzaTaroniVuille_2019.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Vuille J., Biedermann A. 2019, Correspondances partielles d\u2019ADN et identifications erron\u00e9es, Forumpoenale, 12 (1), 58\u201364. [1662-5536] [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/02\/Vuille_Biedermann_2019_Forumpoenale_Postprint_fv2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Vuille J., Biedermann A. 2019, Le d\u00e9clin du mythe de l&#8217;infaillibilit\u00e9 des empreintes digitales, Plaidoyer: revue juridique et politique, 37 (1), 16\u201317. [ISSN: 1420-5556] [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/02\/VuilleBiedermann_2019_PostPrint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>] Translated as:\n<ul>\n<li>Vuille J., Biedermann A. 2019, Auf Fingerabdr\u00fccke ist nicht immer Verlass, Pl\u00e4doyer : das Magazin f\u00fcr Recht und Politik, 37(2), 20\u201321. [ISSN: 1420-5556] [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/08\/Vuille_Biedermann_2019_Plaidoyer.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Vuille J., Bozza S., Taroni F. 2019, Letter to the Editor \u2014 Commentary on: Dror IG, Langenburg G. \u201cCannot decide\u201d: the fine line between appropriate inconclusive determinations versus unjustifiably deciding not to decide, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64, 318\u2013321, doi.org\/10.1111\/1556-4029.13944. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/01\/Preprint_Biedermannetal_Inconclusive.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h6>2018<\/h6>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<ul>\n<li>Biedermann A., Vuille J. 2018, The decisional nature of probability and plausibility assessments in juridical evidence and proof, International Commentary on Evidence, 16, 1\u201330, doi.org\/10.1515\/ice-2019-0003. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2019\/09\/20190918_BiedermannVuille_Preprint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F., Garbolino P. 2018, A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the \u2018goodness\u2019 of forensic identification decisions, Law, Probability and Risk, 17, 295\u2013310, doi.org\/10.1093\/lpr\/mgy016. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/12\/20180625_GoodnessLPR_PostPrint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Vuille J. 2018, Understanding the logic of forensic identification decisions (without numbers), sui generis, 397\u2013413, doi.org\/10.21257\/sg.83. [<a href=\"https:\/\/sui-generis.ch\/83\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">online<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/11\/1979-1639-1-PB.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Kotsoglou N. 2018, Decisional dimensions in expert witness testimony \u2013 A structural analysis, Frontiers in Psychology (Cognition), 9, Article 2073, Research topic &#8216;Judgment and Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Perspectives&#8217;, 1\u201315, doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.02073. [<a href=\"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.02073\/full\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">online<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/11\/Biedermann_Kyriakos_2018.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Thompson W.C., Vuille J., Taroni F., Biedermann A. 2018, \u72ec\u7279\u6027\u4e4b\u540e:\u6cd5\u5ead\u79d1\u5b66\u610f\u89c1\u7684\u6f14\u8fdb (After uniqueness: the evolution of forensic science opinions), Henry Zhuhao Wang (transl.), \u8bc1\u636e\u79d1\u5b66 (Evidence Science), 26, 503\u2013513, ISSN 1674\u20131226. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/10\/Thompson_etla_2018_EvidenceScience.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Taroni F., Biedermann A., Vuille J., Bozza S. 2018, Statistical adhockeries are no criteria for legal decisions \u2013 The case of the expert medical report on the assessment of urine specimens collected among athletes having participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games, Frontiers in Sociology (Research topic &#8216;The interface between forensic scientists and statisticians when calculating likelihood ratios for low template and complex DNA results&#8217;), doi.org\/10.3389\/fsoc.2018.00025. [<a href=\"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsoc.2018.00025\/full\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">online<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/08\/fsoc-03-00025.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Aitken C., Nordgaard A., Taroni F., Biedermann A. 2018, Commentary: Likelihood ratio as weight of forensic evidence: A closer look, Frontiers in Genetics, 9, 1-2, doi.org\/10.3389\/fgene.2018.00224. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/06\/AitkenNordgaardTaroniBiedermann_2018.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Taylor D., Kokshoorn B., Biedermann A. 2018, Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 36, 34\u201349, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsigen.2018.06.001. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/06\/TaylorKokshoornBiedermann_2018_Authorversion.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Taroni F., Bozza S., Augsburger M., Aitken C. 2018, Critical analysis of forensic cut-offs and legal thresholds: a coherent approach to inference and decision, Forensic Science International, 288, 72\u201380, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2018.04.030. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/04\/Cutoff_v10_PREPRINT-copie.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Thompson W.C., Vuille J., Taroni F., Biedermann A. 2018, After uniqueness: the evolution of forensic science opinions, Judicature, 102, 18\u201327, ISSN 0022-5800. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/04\/ThompsonVuilleTaroniBiedermann_2018_Full.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F. 2018, Analysing and exemplifying forensic conclusion criteria in terms of Bayesian decision theory, Science &amp; Justice, 58, 159\u2013165, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2017.07.002. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/03\/Biedermann_etal_2018.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Taylor D., Biedermann A., Hicks T., Champod C. 2018, A template for constructing Bayesian networks\u00a0in forensic biology\u00a0cases when considering activity level propositions, Forensic Science International:\u00a0Genetics, 33, 136\u2013146,\u00a0doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsigen.2017.12.006. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2018\/01\/Taylor_etal_2018_TemplateBN.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h6>2017<\/h6>\n<ul>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F., Aitken C. 2017, The meaning of justified subjectivism and its role in the reconciliation of recent disagreements over forensic probabilism, Science &amp; Justice (Virtual Special Issue &#8220;Measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios&#8221;), 57, 477-483, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2017.08.005. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2017\/11\/Biedermann_etal_2017_Subjectivism.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Hicks T., Biedermann A., de Koeijer J.A., Taroni F., Champod C., Evett I.W. 2017, Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison &#8211; A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence\/observations when formulating propositions, Science &amp; Justice, 57, 401-402, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2017.04.005. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/Hicks_etal_2017_PostPrint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Zhang B. 2017, Preface for the 2nd ISSSES special issue, Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine, 3, 47-48, dx.doi.org\/10.4103\/jfsm.jfsm_50_17. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/Biedermann_Zhang_2017_JForensicSciMed3247-5432032_150520.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Gaborini L., Biedermann A., Taroni F. 2017, Towards a Bayesian evaluation of features in questioned handwritten signatures, Science &amp; Justice, 57, 209-220, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2017.01.004. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/Gaborini_etal_2017_Archive_PDF.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F., Lucena Molina JJ. 2017, Reconsiderando la individualizacion forense como una decision (Rethinking forensic individualization as a decision), Revista Espa\u00f1ola de Medicina Legal, 43, 87-88, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.reml.2016.11.001. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/20170428_Archive2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Moreillon L., Vuille J., Biedermann A., Champod C. 2017,\u00a0Les nouvelles lignes directrices du European Network of Forensic Science Institutes en mati\u00e8re d\u2019\u00e9valuation et de communication des r\u00e9sultats d\u2019analyses et d\u2019expertises scientifiques, forumpoenale, 105-110. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/20170412_Moreillon_etal_Archive_PDF2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Taylor D., Biedermann A., Samie L., Pun K.-M., Hicks T., Champod C. 2017, Helping to distinguish primary from secondary transfer events for trace DNA, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 28, 155-177, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsigen.2017.02.008. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/Archive5.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Champod C., Willis S. 2017, Development of European standards for evaluative reporting in forensic science: The gap between intentions and perceptions, The International Journal of Evidence &amp; Proof, Special issue on Proof in Modern Litigation: Selected Essays of the 5th International Conference on Evidence Law and Forensic Science, 21, 14-29, doi: doi.org\/10.1177\/1365712716674796. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/BiedermannChampodWillis_2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F., Aitken C. 2017, The consequences of understanding expert probability reporting as a decision, Science &amp; Justice, Special Issue on Measuring and Reporting the Precision of Forensic Likelihood Ratios, 57, 80-85, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2016.10.005. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/BiedermannBozzaTaroniAitken_2017c.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h6>2016<\/h6>\n<ul>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F. 2016, La naturaleza decisoria de las conclusiones de los expertos en ciencia forense (The decisionalization of individualization), Teoria y derecho, 20, 262-284, ISSN 1888&#8211;3443.\u00a0 [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/BiedermannBozzaTaroni_TeoriaDerecho_2016_Archive.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Champod C., Jackson G., Gill P., Taylor D., Butler J., Morling N., Hicks T., Vuille J., Taroni F. 2016, Evaluation of forensic DNA traces when propositions of interest relate to activities: analysis and discussion of recurrent concerns, Frontiers in Genetics, Statistical Genetics and Methodology (Research topic &#8216;The interface between forensic scientists and statisticians when calculating likelihood ratios for low template and complex DNA results&#8217;), 7, 215, 1-12, doi: doi.org\/10.3389\/fgene.2016.00215. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/fgene-07-00215.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F., Li B., Zhao D. 2016, The decisionalization of individualization (Chinese translation), (Evidence Science), 24, 627-641, ISSN 1674&#8211;1226. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/\u540c\u4e00\u8ba4\u5b9a_\u4e2d\u7684\u610f\u89c1\u51b3\u7b56\u8bba_A_Biedermann_S_B_\u7701\u7565__F_Tar.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F., Aitken C. 2016, Reframing the debate: a question of probability, not of likelihood ratio, Science &amp; Justice, Special Issue on Measuring and Reporting the Precision of Forensic Likelihood Ratios, 56, 392-396, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2016.05.008. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/DiscussionLRV7_FullID_PDF.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Marquis R., Biedermann A., Cadola L., Champod C., Gueissaz L., Massonnet G., Mazzella WD, Taroni F, Hicks T. 2016, Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings, Science &amp; Justice, 56, 364-370, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scijus.2016.05.009. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/1-s2.0-S1355030616300338-main.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F., F\u00fcrbach M., Li B., Mazzella W.D. 2016, Analysis and evaluation of magnetism of black toners on documents printed by electrophotographic systems, Forensic Science International, 267, 157-165, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2016.08.024. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/20160827_MagnetismV6_Archive.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F. 2016, The decisionalization of individualization, Forensic Science International, 266, 29-38, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2016.04.029. [<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0379073816301840\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">online<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2016\/05\/BiedermannBozzaTaroni_2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Vuille J. 2016, Digital evidence, &#8216;absence&#8217; of data and ambiguous patterns of reasoning, Digital Investigation (<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2016\/03\/DFRWS-EU-2016-save-the-date.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">DFRWS 2016 Europe (Digital Forensic Research Workshop)<\/a>, Proceedings of the Third Annual DFRWS Europe Conference), 16, S86-S96, dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.diin.2016.01.011. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2016\/03\/Biedermann_Vuille_2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Taroni F., Bozza S., Biedermann A., Aitken C.G.G. 2016, Rejoinder, Law, Probability and Risk, 15, 31-34. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/Reply_VF_21052015-1_PDF.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Taroni F., Bozza S., Biedermann A., Aitken C.G.G. 2016, Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty in the assessment of a likelihood ratio (with discussion), Law, Probability and Risk, 15, 1-16. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/Uncertainty_LR_9072015_PDF.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Hicks T. 2016, The importance of critically examining the level of propositions when evaluating forensic DNA results, Frontiers in Genetics, Genomic Assay Technology (Research topic &#8216;The interface between forensic scientists and statisticians when calculating likelihood ratios for low template and complex DNA results&#8217;), 7, 8, dx.doi.org\/10.3389\/fgene.2016.00008. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2016\/02\/Biedermann_Hicks_2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>] [<a href=\"https:\/\/journal.frontiersin.org\/article\/10.3389\/fgene.2016.00008\/full\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">online<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Taroni F., Biedermann A., Bozza S. 2016, Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: Should we abandon <em>p<\/em>-value in forensic science applications?, Forensic Science International, 259, e32-e36, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2015.11.013. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2016\/01\/TaroniBiedermannBozza_2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Champod C., Biedermann A., Vuille J., Willis S., De Kinder J. 2016, ENFSI Guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science: A primer for legal practitioners.\n<ul>\n<li>Distributed at: American Academy for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 2016 Annual Meeting, Session &#8220;Forensic sciences: toward a stronger scientific framework&#8221; (February 14th, 2016), Washington DC. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2016\/02\/Champod_etal_Primer_2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Published also in: Criminal Law &amp; Justice Weekly 2016, 180, 189-193, ISBN\/ISSN Z000050570119. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/ChampodBiedermannVuilleWillisDeKinder_2016PDF.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h6>2015<\/h6>\n<p><em>Chapters<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Vuille J., Biedermann A., Taroni F. 2015, Accounting for the potential of error in the evaluation of the weight of scientific evidence, in : Understanding Wrongful Conviction. The Protection of the Innocent Across Europe and America), collana editoriale \u2018Giustizia penale europea\u2019, Luparia L. (Ed.), Milano: Wolters Kluwer, 39\u201355.<\/li>\n<li>Aitken C.G.G., Taroni F., Biedermann A. 2015, Statistical interpretation of evidence : Bayesian analysis, in: Forensic Chemistry, First Edition, Houck M. (Ed.), Waltham : Academic Press, 331\u2013336. Also reprinted in: Forensic Biology, First Edition, 2015, Houck M. (Ed.), San Diego : Academic Press\/Elsevier, 155\u2013161.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Peer-reviewed articles<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Taroni F., Biedermann A. 2015, Uncertainty in forensic science: experts, probabilities and Bayes&#8217; theorem, Statistica Applicata &#8211; Italian Journal of Applied Statistics, 27, 129-144, ISSN 1125-1964. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/01\/Taroni_Biedermann_2015b.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li>Hicks T., Biedermann A., de Koeijer J.A., Taroni F., Champod C., Evett I.W. 2015, The importance of distinguishing information from evidence\/observations when formulating propositions, Science &amp; Justice, 55, 520\u2013525.<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A. 2015, The role of the subjectivist position in the probabilization of forensic science, Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine, 1, 140\u2013148. [<a href=\"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/files\/2015\/11\/Biedermann_2015_JForensicSciMed_2015_1_2_140_169569.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Letters and commentaries<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 11\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<ul>\n<li>Biedermann A., Vuille J., Taroni F., Champod C. 2015, The need for reporting standards in forensic science, Law, Probability and Risk, 14, 169-173, doi:10.1093\/lpr\/mgv003.<\/li>\n<li>Biedermann A., Bozza S., Taroni F. 2015, Prediction in forensic science : a critical examination of current understandings, Frontiers in Psychology, Quantitative Psychology and Measurement (Research topic \u2018Judgment and decision under uncertainty : Theory and measurement\u2019), 6, 737, <a href=\"https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2015.00737\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">doi:10.3389\/fpsyg.2015.00737<\/a>. [Open Access]<\/li>\n<li>Gallidabino M., Biedermann A., Taroni F. 2015, Forensic interpretation of GSR particle findings: is the challenge really statistical? (commentary on: Gauriot R, Gunaratnam L, Moroni R, Reinikainen T, Corander R. Statistical challenges in the quantification of gunshot residue evidence. J Forensic Sci 2013; 58 (5); 1149&#8211;1155.), Journal of Forensic Sciences, 60, 539\u2013541.<\/li>\n<li>Taroni F., Biedermann A. 2015, Comment on R. G. Cowell et al., Analysis of forensic DNA mixtures with artefacts (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series C, Applied Statistics), 64, 1\u201348 (at pp. 37\u201338).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Full lists of publications of Alex Biedermann are available on <a title=\"Publications of Alex Biedermann on Research Gate\" href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/profile\/Alex_Biedermann\/publications\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Research Gate<\/a> and <a title=\"List of publications of Alex Biedermann on Unisciences\" href=\"https:\/\/applicationspub.unil.ch\/interpub\/noauth\/php\/Un\/UnPers.php?PerNum=30597&amp;LanCode=8&amp;menu=pub\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Unisciences<\/a>. A limited number of publications is also available on <a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/cf_dev\/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1062698\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">SSRN<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2026 Morrison G.S., Biedermann A., Tart M., Meuwly D., Berger C.E.H., Guiness J. 2026, Addendum to: A response to EA-4\/23 INF:2025 &#8220;The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO\/IEC 17025:2017&#8221;, Forensic Science International, 381, 112857, doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2026.112857. [PDF] 2025 Biedermann A. 2025, Distinguishing exogenously and endogenously defined reliability from individual report accuracy in expert [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1001100,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":5,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"templates\/template-full-width.php","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-82","page","type-page","status-publish"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/82","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1001100"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/82\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1110,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/82\/revisions\/1110"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/forensicdecision\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}