{"id":7406,"date":"2023-01-17T11:14:19","date_gmt":"2023-01-17T10:14:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/?p=7406"},"modified":"2023-01-17T11:14:21","modified_gmt":"2023-01-17T10:14:21","slug":"dimitri-courant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/2023\/01\/dimitri-courant\/","title":{"rendered":"Dimitri Courant"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Le nouvel esprit du tirage au sort. Principes d\u00e9mocratiques et repr\u00e9sentation politique des mini-publics d\u00e9lib\u00e9ratifs<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>Dimitri Courant est titulaire d\u2019un Master en science politique de Sciences Po Rennes et d\u2019un Master en sciences sociales de l\u2019Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales. Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 assistant dipl\u00f4m\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019Institut d\u2019\u00e9tudes politiques (IEP) et a r\u00e9alis\u00e9 une th\u00e8se en science politique en cotutelle entre l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Lausanne et l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Paris 8, qu\u2019il a soutenue le 30 juin 2022 sous la co-direction du Prof. Jean-Philippe Leresche (IEP) et Prof. Yves Sintomer (Universit\u00e9 de Paris 8). Il a \u00e9galement \u00e9t\u00e9 chercheur invit\u00e9 \u00e0 Harvard University pendant un an (2021-2022) et est actuellement chercheur postdoctoral \u00e0 Princeton University. Ses travaux portent sur la d\u00e9lib\u00e9ration, la repr\u00e9sentation politique, la d\u00e9mocratie et les usages du tirage au sort au XXIe si\u00e8cle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Le retour du tirage au sort en politique est d\u00e9sormais un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne social mondial, aliment\u00e9 par de nombreux travaux acad\u00e9miques, revendications militantes et exp\u00e9rimentations d\u00e9mocratiques. Les mini-publics d\u00e9lib\u00e9ratifs regroupent des citoyens tir\u00e9s au sort qui auditionnent des experts et d\u00e9battent pour faire des recommandations de politiques publiques. Pourquoi le tirage au sort est-il mis en avant \u00e0 la fois par des \u00e9lites mod\u00e9r\u00e9es pro-\u00e9lection et par des activistes souhaitant une d\u00e9mocratie radicale ? Quelle dynamique politique les usages contemporains du tirage au sort favorisent-ils, un renforcement oligarchique ou bien d\u00e9mocratique ?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cette th\u00e8se r\u00e9alise une analyse comparative bas\u00e9e sur des enqu\u00eates qualitatives portant sur : les assembl\u00e9es citoyennes irlandaises (Irlande), la Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat, le Grand D\u00e9bat National, et le groupe citoyen du CESE (France). Quatre axes sont \u00e9tudi\u00e9s : la gen\u00e8se des mini-publics, leurs fonctionnements, leurs effets et l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9s, ainsi que leurs institutionnalisations. Un nouvel esprit du tirage au sort reposant sur la \u00ab l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9-humilit\u00e9 \u00bb pourrait expliquer les soutiens paradoxaux dont la sortition b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie. Les critiques de l\u2019\u00e9lection soutiennent le tirage au sort car la l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9-humilit\u00e9 peut contribuer \u00e0 la non-domination des repr\u00e9sent\u00e9s. Cependant, les partisans du gouvernement repr\u00e9sentatif voient dans la l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9 faible des mini-publics consultatifs le moyen d\u2019int\u00e9grer la critique sans menacer les fondements du syst\u00e8me \u00e9litiste. Toutefois, la l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9-humilit\u00e9 est potentiellement menac\u00e9e par une revendication kl\u00e9rocratique affirmant la souverainet\u00e9 de l\u2019assembl\u00e9e tir\u00e9e au sort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The return of sortition to politics is now a global social phenomenon, fueled by numerous academic studies, activist claims and democratic experiments. Deliberative mini-publics bring together randomly selected citizens to hear experts and debate to make public policy recommendations. Why is sortition being promoted by both moderate pro-election elites and activists seeking radical democracy? What political dynamics do contemporary uses of the civic lottery promote, oligarchic or democratic reinforcement? This thesis conducts a comparative analysis based on qualitative fieldwork case studies of: the Irish Citizens\u2019 Assemblies (Ireland), the Citizen Convention for Climate, the Great National Debate, and the CESE\u2019s citizen group (France). Four axes are studied: the genesis of the mini-publics, their operation, their effects and legitimacies, and their institutionalizations. A new spirit of sortition based on \u201chumility-legitimacy\u201d might explain in part the paradoxical support that drawing lots enjoys. Critics of election support sortition because humility-legitimacy can contribute to the non-domination of the represented. However, proponents of representative government see the weak legitimacy of consultative mini-publics as a way to incorporate criticism without threatening the foundations of the elitist system. However, humility-legitimacy is potentially threatened by a klerocratic claim to the sovereignty of the randomly selected assembly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le nouvel esprit du tirage au sort. Principes d\u00e9mocratiques et repr\u00e9sentation politique des mini-publics d\u00e9lib\u00e9ratifs<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":163,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_EventAllDay":false,"_EventTimezone":"","_EventStartDate":"","_EventEndDate":"","_EventStartDateUTC":"","_EventEndDateUTC":"","_EventShowMap":false,"_EventShowMapLink":false,"_EventURL":"","_EventCost":"","_EventCostDescription":"","_EventCurrencySymbol":"","_EventCurrencyCode":"","_EventCurrencyPosition":"","_EventDateTimeSeparator":"","_EventTimeRangeSeparator":"","_EventOrganizerID":[],"_EventVenueID":[],"_OrganizerEmail":"","_OrganizerPhone":"","_OrganizerWebsite":"","_VenueAddress":"","_VenueCity":"","_VenueCountry":"","_VenueProvince":"","_VenueState":"","_VenueZip":"","_VenuePhone":"","_VenueURL":"","_VenueStateProvince":"","_VenueLat":"","_VenueLng":"","_VenueShowMap":false,"_VenueShowMapLink":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19451],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-theses"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"hitmag-landscape":false,"hitmag-featured":false,"hitmag-grid":false,"hitmag-list":false,"hitmag-thumbnail":false,"gform-image-choice-sm":false,"gform-image-choice-md":false,"gform-image-choice-lg":false,"mailpoet_newsletter_max":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"sschlat1","author_link":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/author\/sschlat1\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Le nouvel esprit du tirage au sort. Principes d\u00e9mocratiques et repr\u00e9sentation politique des mini-publics d\u00e9lib\u00e9ratifs","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/163"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7406\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}