{"id":1152,"date":"2014-05-02T09:18:57","date_gmt":"2014-05-02T07:18:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/?p=1152"},"modified":"2014-05-07T11:21:40","modified_gmt":"2014-05-07T09:21:40","slug":"tiina-likki","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/2014\/05\/tiina-likki\/","title":{"rendered":"Tiina Likki"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Contexts and typologies in the analysis of welfare state legitimacy : A social psychological approach to political opinion formation<br \/>\n<\/strong><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><em>Tiina Likki a obtenu son Master en psychologie sociale en Finlande \u00e0 l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Helsinki en 2008. Elle a ensuite rejoint l\u2019UNIL en tant que doctorante FNS, puis assistante dipl\u00f4m\u00e9e. Elle a soutenu sa th\u00e8se de doctorat, sous la dir. du Prof. Christian Staerkl\u00e9, en janvier 2014. Actuellement, elle s\u2019int\u00e9resse aux applications de la psychologie sociale dans le domaine des politiques publiques.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Cette th\u00e8se avait pour but d\u2019analyser l\u2019opinion publique envers l\u2019Etat social dans 29 pays europ\u00e9ens. Bas\u00e9e sur une approche interdisciplinaire qui combine des perspectives psycho-sociales, sociologiques et d\u2019opinion publique sur la formation d\u2019opinion politique, ce travail \u00e9tudie comment la position sociale et les croyances partag\u00e9es fa\u00e7onnent la l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9 per\u00e7ue des institutions de l\u2019Etat social, et comment les contextes sociaux influencent les processus de formation d\u2019opinion.<\/p>\n<p>Bas\u00e9e sur la th\u00e9orie des repr\u00e9sentations sociales, ainsi que sur une approche de socialisation et d\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat propre, cette th\u00e8se analyse le r\u00f4le des positions sociales dans le soutien envers la solidarit\u00e9 institutionnelle. Les croyances normatives &#8211; d\u00e9finies comme les visions pr\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9es de l\u2019organisation des rapports sociaux &#8211; m\u00e9diatisent l\u2019effet de la position sociale sur le soutien \u00e0 l\u2019Etat social. De plus, s\u2019inspirant de la litt\u00e9rature sur l\u2019opinion publique, la th\u00e8se analyse la formation d\u2019opinion en fonction des facteurs structurels (comme le taux de d\u00e9penses sociales, le ch\u00f4mage) et id\u00e9ologiques (comme le degr\u00e9 de m\u00e9ritocratie).<\/p>\n<p>Le travail est compos\u00e9 de deux chapitres th\u00e9oriques ainsi que de quatre chapitres empiriques, dont trois utilisent des donn\u00e9es provenant de l\u2019enqu\u00eate European Social Survey 2008. Appliquant des approches multi-niveaux et typologiques, la th\u00e8se contribue \u00e0 la litt\u00e9rature sur les attitudes envers l\u2019Etat social en montrant que les croyances normatives, telles que la m\u00e9fiance ou l\u2019\u00e9galitarisme, fonctionnent comme des m\u00e9canismes sous-jacents qui relient la position sociale aux attitudes politiques (chapitre 3), et que les caract\u00e9ristiques des contextes nationaux influencent les processus de formation d\u2019opinion politique (chapitres 3 et 4). Le chapitre 5 propose et pr\u00e9dit une typologie sur le rapport entre les attitudes envers la solidarit\u00e9 et celles envers le contr\u00f4le, renvoyant \u00e0 deux domaines centraux de r\u00e9gulation \u00e9tatique. Enfin, le chapitre 6 examine le soutien \u00e0 l\u2019Etat social dans le domaine de l\u2019action protestataire, utilisant des donn\u00e9es d\u2019une enqu\u00eate men\u00e9e aupr\u00e8s des militants espagnols du mouvement des Indign\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<p>Les r\u00e9sultats de cette th\u00e8se apportent des \u00e9l\u00e9ments qui \u00e9clairent les d\u00e9bats contemporains sur la l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9 de l\u2019Etat social et son d\u00e9mant\u00e8lement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Contexts and typologies in the analysis of welfare state legitimacy : A social psychological approach to political opinion formation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":163,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_EventAllDay":false,"_EventTimezone":"","_EventStartDate":"","_EventEndDate":"","_EventStartDateUTC":"","_EventEndDateUTC":"","_EventShowMap":false,"_EventShowMapLink":false,"_EventURL":"","_EventCost":"","_EventCostDescription":"","_EventCurrencySymbol":"","_EventCurrencyCode":"","_EventCurrencyPosition":"","_EventDateTimeSeparator":"","_EventTimeRangeSeparator":"","_EventOrganizerID":[],"_EventVenueID":[],"_OrganizerEmail":"","_OrganizerPhone":"","_OrganizerWebsite":"","_VenueAddress":"","_VenueCity":"","_VenueCountry":"","_VenueProvince":"","_VenueState":"","_VenueZip":"","_VenuePhone":"","_VenueURL":"","_VenueStateProvince":"","_VenueLat":"","_VenueLng":"","_VenueShowMap":false,"_VenueShowMapLink":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19459,19451],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-numero-6","category-theses"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"hitmag-landscape":false,"hitmag-featured":false,"hitmag-grid":false,"hitmag-list":false,"hitmag-thumbnail":false,"gform-image-choice-sm":false,"gform-image-choice-md":false,"gform-image-choice-lg":false,"mailpoet_newsletter_max":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"sschlat1","author_link":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/author\/sschlat1\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Contexts and typologies in the analysis of welfare state legitimacy : A social psychological approach to political opinion formation","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/163"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1152"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1152\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.unil.ch\/esspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}