Bibliography

 

References

Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 485-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 378-395.

Aubert-Lotarski, A., Capdevielle-Mougnibas, V. (2002). Dialogue méthodologique autour de l’utilisation du logiciel Alceste en sciences humaines et sociales: « lisibilité » du corpus et interprétation des résultats. 6èmes Journées Internationales d’Analyse Textuelle. Saint-Malo.

Ballinger, C. (2006). Demonstrating Rigour and Quality. In L. Finlay & C. Ballinger (Eds.), Qualitative Research for Allied Health Professionals. Challenging Choices (pp. 235-46). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.

Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigor in qualitative research : A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322(5), 1115-1117.

Beck, C.T. (2009). Critiquing qualitative research. AORN journal, 90(4), 543-554.

Blaxter, M. (1996). Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Medical Sociological News, 22(1), 68–71.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Britten, N., Jones, R., Murphy, E., & Stacy, R. (1995). Qualitative research method in general practice and primary care. Family Practice, 12(1), 104-114.

Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., & Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 671-684.

Cesario, S., Morin, K., & Santa-Donato, A. (2002). Evaluating the Level of Evidence of Qualitative Research. JOGNN, 31(6), 708-714.

Chamberlain, K., Stephens, C., & Lyons, A.C. (1997). Encompassing experience: meanings and methods in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 12(5), 691-709.

Cicourel, A. (1964). Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: Free Press.

Cobb, A.K., & Hagemaster, J.N. (1987). Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals. The Journal of nursing education, 26(4), 138-143.

Cohen, D.J., & Crabtree, B.F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: Controversies and recommendations. The Annals of Family Medicine, 6(4), 331-339.

Côté, L., & Turgeon, J. (2005). Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Medical Teacher, 27(1): 71-75.

Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) (2006) Qualitative Research Checklist. Public Health Resource Unit, England. Available: http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_951541699e9edc71ce66c9bac4734c69.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2014.

Curtin, M., & Fossey, E. (2007). Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), 88-94.

Daly, J., Willis, K., Small, R., Green, J., Welch, N., et al. (2007). A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 43-49.

Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). (1994/2011) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.

Devers, K.J. (1999). How will we know “Good” qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1153-1188.

Dixon-Woods, M., Shaw, R.L., Agarwal, S., & Smith, J.A. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(3), 223-225.

Elder, N.C., & Miller, W.L. (1995). Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies. Journal of Family Practice, 41(3), 279-285.

Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T., & Rennie, D.L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215-229.

Emden, C., & Sandelowski, M. (1998). The good, the bad and the relative, part one: Conceptions of goodness in qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 4, 206-212.

Emden, C., & Sandelowski, M. (1999). The good, the bad and the relative, part two: Goodness and the criterion problem in qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 5, 2-7.

Flick, U. (2006). Quality criteria in qualitative research. In U. Flick (Ed.), An introduction to qualitative research (pp. 367-389). London: Sage Publications.

Flick, U. (2007). Managing quality in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717-732.

Forchuk, C. & Roberts J. (1993).How to Critique Qualitative Research Articles.Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 25(4), 47-56.

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

Garric, N., Capdevielle-Mougnibas, V. (2009). La variation comme principe d’exploration de corpus : Intérêts et limites de l’analyse lexicométrique interdisciplinaire pour l’étude du discours. Corpus, 8, 105-128.

Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266-275.

Giacomini, M.K., & Cook, D.J. (2000). Users’ guides to the medical literature, XXIII: qualitative research in health care. Are the results of the study valid? Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(3), 357–62.

Green, J., & Britten, N. (1998). Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. BMJ, 316, 1230-1232.

Greenhalgh, T, & Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper: papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ, 315, 740-743.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981) Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Guba, E.G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Hamberg, K., Johansson, E., Lindgren, G., & Westman, G. (1994). Scientific rigour in qualitative research: examples from a study of women’s health in family practice. Family Practice, 11(2), 176-181.

Huston, P., & Rowan, M. (1998). Qualitative studies. Their role in medical research.Canadian Family Physician, 44, 2453-2511.

Jaye, C. (2002). Doing qualitative research in general practice: methodological utility and engagement. Family Practice, 19(5), 557-562.

Johnson, M., Long, T., & White, A. (2001).Arguments for ‘British Pluralism’ in qualitative health research.Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(2), 243-249.

Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research, 33(7), 14-26.

Kalampalikis, N. (2003). L’apport de la méthode Alceste dans l’étude des représentations sociales. In J.-C. Abric (Ed.), Méthodes d’étude des représentations sociales (pp. 147-163). Paris: Erès.

Koch, T. (1994/2006). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 976-986.

Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuper, A., Lingard L., & Levinson, W. (2008). Critically appraising qualitative research, BMJ, 337, 687-689.

Leininger, M. (1994/2004). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Lincoln, Y.S., Lynham, S.A., & Guba, E.G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln YS (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97-128). London: Sage.

Lingard, L., Albert, M., & Levinson, W. (2008). Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. British Medical Journal, 337(567), 459–461.

Long, A. F., & Godfrey, M. (2004).An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies.International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(2), 181-196.

Long, T., & Johnson, M. (2000). Rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research.Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, 4, 30–37.

Marshall, C., &Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1996). Qualitative research in health care. London: BMJ Books.

Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ, 320, 50-52.

Meyrick, J. (2006). What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(5), 799-808.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Morse, J.M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1-19.

Morse, J. M. (2003). A Review Committee’s Guide for Evaluating Qualitative Proposals.Qualitative Health Research, 13(6), 833-851.

Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., & Watson, P. (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment, 2(16).

Murphy, F. J., & Yielder, J. (2010). Establishing rigour in qualitative radiography research. Radiography, 16, 62-67.

Murray, M. (2000). Level of narrative analysis in health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 5(3), 331–342.

O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(2), 92–98.

Paterson, M., & Pentland, W. (2008). The use of hermeneutics in a mixed methods design. Qualitative Report, 13(1), 116-134. Available: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-1/vonzweck.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2014.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. In M. Q. Patton (Ed.), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rded.) (pp. 541-589). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Peters, M., Abu-Saad, H. H., Vydelingum, V., & Murphy, M. (2002). Research into Headache: The Contribution of Qualitative Methods. Headache, 42, 1051-1059.

Pickler, R.H. (2007). Evaluating qualitative research studies. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 21, 195-197.

Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 341-351.

Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Qualitative Research. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ, 311, 42-45.

Pope, C., & Mays, N. (2006). Qualitative research in health care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Porter, S. (2002). Critical realist ethnography. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 53-72). London: Sage.

Reinert, M. (1990). Alceste. Une méthodologie d’analyse des données textuelles et une application : Aurélia de Gérard de Nerval. Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique, 26(1), 24-54.

Reinert, M. (1993). Les “mondes lexicaux” et leur “logique” à travers l’analyse statistique d’un corpus de récits de cauchemars. Langage et société, 66(1), 5-39.

Robert, A.D., Bouillaguet, A. (2002). L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Rogers, A., Popay, J., Williams, G., & Latham, M. (1997). Inequalities in Health and Health Promotion: Insights from the Literature. London: Health Education Authority.

Rolfe, G. (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 304-310.

Rowan, M. & Huston, P. (1997). Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157, 1442-1446.

Russell, C.K., & Gregory, D.M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 6(2), 36-40.

Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(12), 738-744.

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2002). Reading qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(1), 74-108.

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Appraising reports of qualitative studies. In M. Sandelowski, J. Barroso (Eds.), Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research (pp. 75-132). New York: Springer.

Santiago-Delefosse, M., & Rouan, G. (Eds.). (2001) Les méthodes qualitatives en psychologie. Paris: Dunod.

Santiago-Delefosse, M. (2007). Recherche en psychologie et turbulences paradigmatiques. Bulletin de Psychologie, 60, 97-102.

Schneider, K.J. (1998). Toward a science of the heart. Romanticism and the revival of psychology. American Psychologist, 53(3), 277-289.

Schutz, A. (1962). Collected Papers (vol. 2). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Seale, C. (2002). Quality Issues in Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 1(1), 97-110.

Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage Publications.

Smith, J., Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1995). Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage Publications.

Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office.

Stige, B., Malterud, K., &Midtgarden, T. (2009). Towards an Agenda for Evaluation of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(10) 1504-1516.

Stiles, W. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593-618.

Stiles, W.B. (1999). Evaluating qualitative research. Evidence Based Mental Health, 2(4), 99-101.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Thomson, O. P., Petty, N. J., Ramage, C. M., & Moore, A. P. (2011). Qualitative research: Exploring the multiple perspectives of osteopathy. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 14, 116-124.

Tobin, G. A. & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework.Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 388-396.

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357.

Van den Hoonaard W, Given L, Lévy J, McGinn M, O’Neill P, et al. (2004) Giving voice to the spectrum: Report of the social sciences and humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. Ottawa, ON: Interagency Advisory Panel and Secretariat on Research Ethics. Available: http://www.sfu.ca/~palys/SSHWC-GivingVoice-2004.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2014.

Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2004). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211.

Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2006). Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery, 22(2), 108-119.

Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health, 15, 215-228.

Yardley, L. (2008). Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology. A practical guide to research methods (pp. 235-251). London: Sage.